These days there are multiple legal and commercial reasons why companies need to protect their networks from malware, or pornographic downloads, or time wasting and poor system performance, or data theft.
On January 21, 2010, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton delivered a speech on the topic of Internet freedom. Some quotes:
“We stand for a single internet where all of humanity has equal access to knowledge and ideas.”
“We believe it’s critical that its users are assured certain basic freedoms. Freedom of expression is first among them. This freedom is no longer defined solely by whether citizens can go into the town square and criticize their government without fear of retribution. Blogs, emails, social networks, and text messages have opened up new forums for exchanging ideas, and created new targets for censorship. “
“We do not tolerate those who incite others to violence.”
“Those who use the internet to recruit terrorists or distribute stolen intellectual property cannot divorce their online actions from their real world identities.”
“These challenges must not become an excuse for governments to systematically violate the rights and privacy of those who use the internet for peaceful political purposes.”
“We must work to advance the freedom of worship online just as we do in other areas of life.”
“States, terrorists, and those who would act as their proxies must know that the United States will protect our networks.”
“Countries or individuals that engage in cyber attacks should face consequences and international condemnation.”
“The freedom to connect — the idea that governments should not prevent people from connecting to the internet, to websites, or to each other.
Good ideas but tough to implement and little to do with the internet’s orignal purpose. Maybe Google’s recent battles with China had some influence on the message. There is a lot of speculation that Google’s tracking of users was utilised by government and law agencies, and that the spat with China is because they had cracked Google’s security and were able to exploit the same search features to find out information about people. The press largely seemed to suggest Google withdrew it services because China was applyifn censorship to its citizens use of the intenret So is the intrusion into web activity any different in the USA than in China one has to wonder? Where does that leave the UAE? Is is wrong for an Islamic country to try and stop access to porn sites? What about sites like Skype, or banned blogs that are mildly critical of government policy? Who decides? and how can this be done globally when governments can’t even agree two years running on global warming? How will such internet controls impact a company’s views about putting their business systems and data on the cloud? There is a long way to go to action some of the quotes above I fear.
Meanwhile for companies who are concerned about protecting their networks, data and internet usage we provde very specialist solutions and services to support your information security and compliance policies.
Call Kamlesh on: 009714 3365589